<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Places to Use Your Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.site-booster.com/blog/2009/07/top-places-your-keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.site-booster.com/blog/2009/07/top-places-your-keywords/</link>
	<description>Top Search Engine Rankings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo services</title>
		<link>http://www.site-booster.com/blog/2009/07/top-places-your-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link>
		<dc:creator>seo services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site-booster.com/blog/?p=449#comment-4959</guid>
		<description>good day. i am one of the content writers doing articles particularly for a site. i really thought the more i use keywords on my articles the better it is for the site. but through your blog, i learned that it is one way of spamming search engines. this blog is nice that i realized not to focus on obvious redundancy instead settle on word&#039;s synonyms. keep it up. God bless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good day. i am one of the content writers doing articles particularly for a site. i really thought the more i use keywords on my articles the better it is for the site. but through your blog, i learned that it is one way of spamming search engines. this blog is nice that i realized not to focus on obvious redundancy instead settle on word&#8217;s synonyms. keep it up. God bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
